Analysis – Mapping the Requirements of NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, and the EU AI Act

Navigating the evolving and complex landscape for AI governance requirements can be a real challenge for organizations. Previously, Trustible created this comprehensive cheat sheet comparing three important compliance frameworks: the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, ISO 42001, and the EU AI Act. This easy to understand visual maps the similarities and differences between these frameworks, providing a concise reference for organizations implementing responsible AI guardrails.

Now, we’ve gone deeper.

In our new white paper, we analyze each of the key obligations and compare them against each other. While there is overlap among key concepts and requirements, each one takes a slightly different approach to how an organization implements its AI governance structures, processes, and procedures. 

Trustible’s platform is configured to help you comply with all three frameworks, which are now being discussed as the fundamental building blocks of an AI governance strategy.

Read the Full Analysis

Share:

Related Posts

Everything You Need to Know About the Executive Order on a National AI Policy Framework (2025)

On December 11, 2025, President Trump signed an Executive Order directing the federal government to build a “minimally burdensome” national framework for AI and to push back against state AI laws the Administration views as harmful to innovation. The EO takes a new, novel approach via Executive Branch authority, creating an AI Litigation Task Force and asking the U.S. Department of Commerce to evaluate state AI laws and identify “onerous” laws (explicitly citing laws that require models to “alter their truthful outputs”.)

Read More